Close this search box.

DOJ Memorandum on Drug Cases

Attorney General Merrick Garland
Merrick Garland announces drug crimes memorandum

In December the Department of Justice issued a memorandum to all federal prosecutors entitled “Additional Department Policies Regarding Charging, Pleas, and Sentencing in Drug Cases.”  Generally speaking the memorandum encourages prosecutors to exercise discretion and restraint in applying some of the more draconian tools available under federal law, such as mandatory minimums, 851 enhancements, and advocating for Career Offender guidelines.

On the whole, the memorandum has been greeted favorably by the criminal defense community.  But in reality, the memorandum is weak-sauce.  It relies upon the kind of language that is easy to escape in any particular case where a prosecutor can differentiate a case from the the set of cases that would be entitled to relief under the memo.

Furthermore, because the memorandum is merely internal policy guidance, while defense lawyers can appeal to the memo for relief, in reality in court the memorandum will have little effect on judges who are not bound by DOJ policy in determining appropriate sentence.  And, generally speaking, thank God federal judges are not bound by DOJ policy because DOJ policy has often been far more punitive than what federal judges would otherwise impose.

The problem is multi-fold.  In the Eastern District of North Carolina, a guns and drugs district, often the most serious crimes federal judges encounter are large scale drug trafficking crimes.  And while, in a certain sense, these are serious and while they can include violence, they are not murders, rapes, or other violent crime.  Nor are the economically destructive crimes such as large scale corporate malfeasance.

As a consequence, it is not uncommon for federal judges to mete out punishments in the decades for drug crimes, punishments that far exceed what a person might receive in a murder case in state court.

Merrick Garland’s memo, while not unhelpful, does not address the fundamentally punitive nature of federal criminal statutes, something at only our dysfunctional Congress can do.

Call & Text (919) 352-9411

The Chetson Firm - Board Certified Raleigh Criminal Defense Lawyer


More Posts

Federal Criminal Lawyer

Lying on Federal Aid Applications

The New York Times reports that families are breaking federal law in various ways when their children apply for federal student load aid through the FAFSA

The Future of Federal Gun Laws

The Supreme Court’s decision in Bruen last summer striking down a nearly 100 year old New York law regulating the possession of firearms has unleashed

Send Us A Message

Call or Text (919) 352-9411

We fight for the best possible outcome in every case.  We are honest, aggressive and compassionate. 

Practice Areas

Contact Us or Call (919) 352-9411

We will respond soon.